SOAX sits in the “serious” part of the proxy market: residential and mobile IPs, flexible rotation, global coverage. On paper, it looks ideal for arbitrage, scraping and social media. In reality, many teams bump into the same problems:
- Traffic is tied to subscriptions and burns at the end of the billing period
- Paid trial instead of a real free test
- Mandatory verification slows down launch
- Performance varies across GEOs, especially on mobile
- Long, stable sessions for warmed ad or social accounts are not always predictable
If you live off Facebook Ads, TikTok arbitrage, automated shopping or heavy scraping, these things are not just “inconveniences” – they are line items in your profit and loss. That is why more and more teams are looking for SOAX alternatives that are more forgiving on both budget and operations.
Below are seven alternatives, with GonzoProxy in first place, each analyzed by:
- How the traffic model really works (subscription vs pay-per-GB vs lifetime)
- How stable the sessions are for ads, social networks and automation
- How support behaves when accounts burn or scrapers stall
- Where each service is actually strong – and where it will waste your time
The structure is different from the previous SOAX article and the competitor list is new, but the logic stays the same: brutal practicality.
1. GonzoProxy – Best SOAX Alternative for Long-Stick Sessions and Non-Expiring Traffic
Type: P2P residential and mobile
Billing: Pure pay-per-GB, traffic never expires
KYC: Not required, Google sign-in
Who uses it: Arbitrageurs, multi-accounting farms, automation agencies, scrapers on protected sites
GonzoProxy is the only provider in this list that changes the economic model entirely. You buy gigabytes once and they stay on your balance until you spend them. No “month ended – GBs vanished – buy again”.
For performance, GonzoProxy does not rent ranges from datacenters and call them “residential”. It builds on a peer-to-peer network of real user devices: people install an app, share part of their home connection, and get paid. That makes the traffic look like normal residential use from real apartments and houses, not like patterns from a proxy subnet.
Key Advantages of GonzoProxy
Traffic never expires
You can buy 100 GB in January and still be using the same balance in June if your workload is irregular. Campaign pauses, account bans or experiments do not eat your funds.
Unlimited number of proxy endpoints
You are not charged per port or per line. Create hundreds or thousands of proxy credentials for different accounts, teams or projects. The only thing that matters is how many gigabytes you actually burn.
Strong tolerance on Facebook, Google and TikTok
Because IPs are from genuine user devices, anti-fraud systems treat them like normal users, not like server farms. This is critical when you warm accounts, run BM farms, or do multi-creative testing.
Long sticky sessions
You can hold one IP for hours or days when you need a stable identity for an ad account or social profile. For scraping, you can switch to rapid rotation.
No identity verification
You log in with Google and start using the API or proxy endpoints in minutes. No passports, selfies, or scanning corporate documents.
Support in Telegram 24/7
Not just ticket-based “we will get back to you in 48 hours”, but quick support that actually understands arbitrage, cloaking, bots, anti-detect browsers, and how real campaigns are run.
Limitations of GonzoProxy
Not designed as a “budget toy”
Minimum packages are higher than ultra-cheap competitors that charge $1–2 per GB. For serious use this pays off, but for “I want to play with 1 GB and forget” there are cheaper options.
Super exotic locations may have less capacity in peak hours
Core GEOs (US, EU, Tier-1) are strong; very niche countries may have more fluctuation.
Where GonzoProxy Makes More Sense Than SOAX
You run long ad or social sessions where one IP has to survive many days.
Your load is unstable: some weeks you hit it hard, some weeks everything is paused.
You want to avoid paying for traffic that you never got to use.
You are scaling a farm with many profiles and need hundreds of distinct proxies without per-port costs.
If your profit depends on keeping accounts alive and not burning half your budget in unused subscription traffic, GonzoProxy is a more “business-aligned” choice than SOAX.
View Residential Proxy pricing by GonzoProxy.
2. Infatica – High-Speed Residential Proxies for Aggressive Scraping
Type: Ethical residential
Billing: Subscription bundles (traffic expires)
Core strength: Very high throughput and speed
Infatica targets teams that care more about raw scraping speed than about long, sticky identities. It offers a residential pool with bandwidth optimization that works well for crawling large sites quickly.
Advantages
High data throughput
Infatica is tuned for fast downloads. If you run complex crawlers or analytical pipelines, the extra speed can translate into shorter scraping windows and lower infrastructure cost.
Decent pass-through rates
For many sites, success percentages are high enough to sustain serious data collection.
Webhook-enabled API
You can integrate events (like hitting a rate limit or ban) into your own monitoring or scaling logic.
Disadvantages
Short sticky sessions
Session persistence is usually limited to about 30 minutes. This is acceptable for scraping, but weak for account-based operations (social, ads, marketplaces).
Higher price per GB
Infatica usually lands in the more expensive part of the market. You pay for speed and optimization, not for budget efficiency.
No mobile proxies
If you need mobile fingerprints for app-based flows or TikTok/IG behavior, Infatica is not ideal.
Traffic expires by subscription
You commit to a monthly bundle. If you do not fully exhaust it, that margin belongs to the provider.
Best fit: fast scraping of content-heavy sites, where each crawl window is short and aggressive, but you have a stable backlog of data to justify the monthly spend.
3. ProxyRack – Unlimited Bandwidth for Variable Loads
Type: Mixed (residential, datacenter, mobile)
Billing: Port-based, unmetered traffic on many plans
Core strength: Unlimited bandwidth
ProxyRack positions itself as a middle ground between professional infrastructure and flexibility. You often pay per port with unlimited traffic, which is attractive for teams with heavy, consistent scraping.
Advantages
Unlimited traffic
The key appeal. You pay a fixed monthly price and can push as many gigabytes as your infrastructure and the provider allow.
Multiple proxy types
If you want to mix residential for difficult targets and datacenter for easy ones, ProxyRack supports that.
Simple pay-as-you-go
No large long-term commitments; you can ramp up or down by adding or removing ports.
Disadvantages
Limited residential pool size
The residential pool is not as large as some premium players. For extremely high concurrency in the same GEO, saturation might happen.
Success rate below top competitors
For difficult targets, the pass-through rate is noticeably lower than with more specialized alternatives.
No expiration advantage
Even if traffic is “unlimited”, you still lose your ports and capacity at the end of your paid period.
Support and tools are basic
You do not get the same level of monitoring, geo precision, or advanced control as in top-tier providers.
Best suited for: mid-to-large scraping projects where bandwidth volume is the main constraint, and slight drops in success rate are acceptable in exchange for flat costs.
4. IPBurger – Residential Coverage for Classic Web Tasks
Type: Residential
Billing: Subscription bundles
Core strength: Large country list, straightforward use
IPBurger is one of those providers that doesn’t try to be an “all-in-one platform”. It offers standard residential proxies with a wide GEO presence, aimed at web usage like browsing, SEO and moderate scraping.
Advantages
Good global coverage
Over 190 countries, enough for most marketing and research needs.
Simple configuration
The control panel and documentation are accessible even for non-developers. Teams without strong engineering resources can still get going.
Flexible protocols
Support for HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 helps integrate with different tools and environments.
Disadvantages
Short sticky sessions
Session intervals tend to be short (around 10 minutes). That is not ideal for carefully warmed social or ad accounts that live for weeks.
Above-average price
IPBurger is not positioned as “cheap”. You pay a relatively premium rate without getting the most advanced intelligent features.
Subscription-based traffic
Same issue as SOAX: if you bought 50 GB for a month and used only 20, you do not carry the remaining 30 forward.
Support mostly via email
This works, but if your campaign is burning several hundred dollars per hour, waiting for a reply is risky.
Best use: web browsing and scraping tasks where sessions are short and you want wide GEO, but do not need ultra-sticky behavior or non-expiring traffic.
5. Hydra Proxy – Residential Proxies With Moderate Depth
Type: Residential
Billing: Subscription bundles
Core strength: Balanced performance over many countries
Hydra Proxy offers a mid-sized residential pool across more than 140 countries. It is often chosen when projects do not demand extreme depth in any single GEO, but require decent coverage across many.
Advantages
Wide but balanced coverage
Enough IP diversity in a lot of countries, which is useful for localized SEO, ads checks, and basic competitive intelligence.
Decent speeds
For most web targets, speed is comfortable, especially in Europe and North America.
Configurable rotation
You can choose between more frequent rotation for scraping and somewhat stickier behavior for semi-persistent sessions.
Disadvantages
Sticky sessions limited to about 30 minutes
This is a hard constraint if your workflow relies on long-lived cookies and stable IPs.
Subscription with expiring traffic
If your load drops (vacations, bans, freezes from clients), the unspent traffic is lost.
Support hours limited
Not a true 24/7 model; you might have to wait if issues appear outside business hours.
Pricing not ultra competitive
Given the limitations, it is not always the best trade-off for those who count every margin.
Hydra Proxy fills the gap between cheap hobby services and strict enterprise-grade tools. But for ad farms or high-risk social flows, the short stickiness remains a major drawback.
6. Nexus Proxy – Non-Expiring Traffic for Affiliate and Ads Targeting
Type: Residential and mobile
Billing: Pay-per-GB, traffic does not expire
Core strength: Non-expiring model and geo precision
Nexus Proxy is interesting because its traffic also does not expire, but the pool itself is smaller. It focuses on targeting accuracy and flexibility for affiliate campaigns.
Advantages
Traffic remains on the account
Similar to GonzoProxy in this aspect: if you bought a volume, it stays until consumed, without monthly burn.
Precise geo targeting
Allows targeting down to the city level in many cases, which is essential for localized ad creatives and campaign tests.
Refund window on small scale
There is usually a limited refund policy for small early spends, which slightly reduces risk in trials.
Disadvantages
Smaller IP pool
The pool is noticeably smaller than large players. Under heavy load in a niche GEO, you may encounter repetition.
Higher cost per GB
Nexus often prices itself in the mid-to-high range, making it less attractive at scale compared to GonzoProxy.
Less automation tooling
Documentation and management interfaces are more limited; large teams may need to build more wrappers around it.
Nexus Proxy is good when non-expiring traffic plus precise geo are top priorities, and you are ready to tolerate a smaller pool and slightly more manual handling.
7. Rayobyte – Residential + Datacenter Specialisation for the US
Type: Residential, ISP and datacenter
Billing: Mixed (per GB for residential, per proxy for DC)
Core strength: United States–focused infrastructure
Rayobyte, which evolved from Blazing SEO, is strong where many others are average: US infrastructure. For projects whose main target is the American market, that focus can be a competitive edge.
Advantages
Specialized US pools
Good variety of US subnets, including ISP-level addresses, that help with search engines, classifieds and US-based SaaS.
Fast speeds
Residential and especially datacenter proxies have high throughput, suitable for heavy scraping in the US.
API with advanced options
Supports more sophisticated routing and control compared to basic residential providers.
Disadvantages
Strong US bias
Outside the US, coverage and performance are weaker. If you need global reach, this is limiting.
High price for residential traffic
You pay a premium for the US specialization.
Datacenter IPs easier to detect
Although they are fast, platforms classify them as server ranges quickly. Good for some scraping, poor for social or ads.
Traffic expiration
Residential traffic is usually under a subscription model; unused volume still disappears at the end of the term.
Rayobyte works best for US-centric scraping, SEO or compliance monitoring where speed and control are more important than non-expiring billing.
Comparing SOAX and Its Alternatives by What Actually Matters
Instead of focusing on marketing numbers (“millions of IPs”), it is more useful to compare proxies by conditions that affect profit.
1. Traffic Economics
SOAX: subscription, traffic disappears every billing cycle
GonzoProxy: pay-per-GB, traffic never expires
Infatica, ProxyRack, IPBurger, Hydra, Rayobyte: mostly subscription-based
Nexus Proxy: non-expiring pay-per-GB model
If your workloads fluctuate, subscription models effectively tax you for idle periods. Non-expiring balances (GonzoProxy, Nexus Proxy) align better with real arbitrage and agency realities.
2. Session Stability
Long, multi-day sessions: GonzoProxy
Medium sessions (up to 30 minutes): Infatica, Hydra Proxy
Shorter sessions (about 10 minutes): IPBurger
More rotation-focused: ProxyRack, Rayobyte residential in many use cases
For social media farms and ad accounts you want long consistent IP history, not constant cycling. That is where GonzoProxy is materially stronger than SOAX and the others here.
3. Who Should Choose Which Provider?
If you monetize via ads, social media, app installs, or multi-accounting:
GonzoProxy as first choice
Nexus Proxy as backup or secondary supplier
If your core challenge is scraping speed and concurrency:
Infatica or Rayobyte (for US) as strong candidates
ProxyRack when bandwidth cost is more important than success rate
If you need decent coverage and simple flows, but not extreme features:
IPBurger or Hydra Proxy are acceptable with clear constraints
Final Take: When Does Switching Away from SOAX Pay Off?
You do not change a proxy provider “for fun”. You do it when:
- Too many ad accounts or profiles die for no clear reason
- The end of each billing month feels like burning money
- Trials are limited, paid, or require full KYC before you even know if the tool works
- Support is too slow for the speed of your experiments
In that context:
GonzoProxy is the most rational step up from SOAX for performance-driven users. You get residential IPs from real devices, long sticky sessions for accounts and BMs, no-KYC and fast start, and traffic that never expires so you pay only for real usage.
The other six providers in this article, Infatica, ProxyRack, IPBurger, Hydra Proxy, Nexus Proxy and Rayobyte, are situational tools. They are worth looking at when your use case matches their specific strengths: raw scraping speed, unmetered bandwidth, US focus, or compliance and geo-precision constraints.
If you work with proxies to earn, not to play with dashboards, pick services where:
- Session behavior matches what your accounts need.
- The billing model does not punish you for pauses.
- Support speaks the same language as arbitrage, not just generic IT issues.
Measured by those criteria, SOAX is no longer the obvious center of the market. In 2026, tools like GonzoProxy and a carefully selected stack of alternatives give you more flexibility, less waste, and better odds of keeping your campaigns alive.
